Commentator Sunny Hundal has finally mentioned BBC Asian Network on his Pickled Politics blog. Until recently he has had his say via Asians In Media where nobody can comment.
In his latest post, he gives 5 reasons why the Asian Network should not be axed. They are:
.
1) It would reduce competition
2) [the Asian Network is] A source of talent for the BBC and rest of the media
3) It would create ‘parallel lives’
4) It would abandon Asian license fee payers
5) [It would] Remove a vital platform for British Asian culture
Nowhere in his list is there any mention of the most vulnerable and marginalised members of the Asian community: those who have been disowned, or who have fled home to escape forced marriages or other forms of child abuse and domestic violence. There is no mention of those who would like some content for mixed race families, despite the hostility to race mixing in some Asian households. Sunny Hundal knows very well that MixTogether members submitted a widely-supported proposal to the Asian Network last year for this kind of content.
Left wing commentators like Hundal are fond of challenging dominant paradigms. Be it U.S. cultural hegemony or the power of organised religion, they usually have something negative to say about them (and they are often right). When it comes to the dominant paradigm of Asian life in this country however, there is a deafening silence from these ‘principled’ commentators.
In fact across Asian media- in print, on the radio and on TV- those who choose or are forced to live a life outside the traditional community structures are made almost completely invisible. Lip service is paid to their plight in the form of ‘debates’ and the occasional documentary or story piece, but that is as far as it goes. There is a terror of admitting how deep these problems go, so they are covered up behind a glossy screen of Bollywood and bhangra, fair-skinned models and fabulous clothes.
The Asian Network has spent £12m a year on its service. Meanwhile charities who work with the most vulnerable in the Asian community have had their funding cut. Karma Nirvana has had to cut its Honour Helpline service. Where is the fairness in giving £12m of License Fee money to a station aimed at the Asian community when that station does next to nothing to help struggling Asian charities?
Those who find themselves outside the dominant paradigm of Asian life in the UK are rarely seen and never heard. The tiny group of professionals who hold influence within Asian media (and yes many of them owe their careers to the BBC) know that they hold the power to change the outcome for these most vulnerable members of the Asian community. So why do they choose to ignore them?
Is a British woman who has been cut off from her Asian roots by her family for most of her life not a license fee payer too? Does she pay her license fee to fund an Asian station to treat her as if she is invisible? Does she pay to fund ‘debates’ where there is always a call from some hardline traditionalist to remind her why she has been locked out of her own culture?
Are British license fee payers paying the Asian Network to propagate the dominant Asian social paradigm that so many young Asians want to escape from?
And if so, why should the station be saved?
Update: I have emailed Virendra Sharma MP, who is supporting an early day motion on the Asian Network, urging him to take MixTogether’s perspective on board.