British ‘honour’ crimes problem used in the campaign against minarets in Switzerland
The Times reports on the vote to ban the building of minarets in Switzerland:
Ulrich Schlüer, an SVP parliamentarian who drafted the initiative, told The Times that he had been certain of victory because the Swiss had had enough of the Muslim community. “We are still at the beginning of the process. We compare our situation to Germany, France or England — the problems they have in their suburbs,” he said. “That is what we do not want here.”
The Guardian reports:
The SPP said that going to the European court would breach the popular sovereignty that underpins the Swiss democratic model and tradition.
It dismissed the arguments about freedom or religion, asserting that minarets were not a religious but a political symbol, and the thin end of a wedge that would bring sharia law to the country, with forced marriages, “honour” killings, female genital mutilation and oppression of women.
Radical feminists in Switzerland backed the campaign and specified their opposition to ‘honour’ crimes as a reason:
Tatiana, a teacher who had previously voted for the left, was quoted in a newspaper as saying she would vote for the minaret ban as she could “no longer bear being mistreated and terrorised by boys who believe women are worthless”.
Socialist politicians have been furious to see icons of the left joining what is regarded as an anti-immigrant campaign by the populist Swiss People’s party, the biggest group in parliament.
One of them, Julia Onken, warned that failure to ban minarets would be “a signal of the state’s acceptance of the oppression of women”. She has sent out 4,000 emails attacking Muslims who condone forced marriage, honour killings and beating women.
Whatever your thoughts on the ban, it is encouraging to see feminists putting party politics aside to fight against ‘honour’ crimes



